Skip to main content
PensionRisk

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (A) and Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 88% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.9 percentage points (93.7% vs 87.8%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

MetricAT&T Pension Benefit PlanTexas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*82/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
93.7%*87.8%
Total Assets$30.0B$36.8B
Total Liabilities$32.0B*$41.9B
Unfunded Liability$2.0B*$5.1B
Participants286,355218,000
1-Year Investment Return6.9%*6.3%
Plan Typecorporatepublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorAT&T Inc.Texas Cities

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.9 percentage points (93.7% vs 87.8%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

Explore More