Skip to main content
PensionRisk

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) grades C while Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) grades A. Funding ratios: 67% vs 90%.

Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 84/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 22.2 percentage points (89.5% vs 67.3%). Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) covers 27,500 participants.

MetricCalifornia Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS)Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
58/100 (C)84/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
67.3%89.5%*
Total Assets$473.0B$31.2B
Total Liabilities$703.0B$34.9B*
Unfunded Liability$230.0B$3.7B*
Participants2,050,00027,500
1-Year Investment Return5.8%6.5%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of CaliforniaCity of Los Angeles

Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 84/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 22.2 percentage points (89.5% vs 67.3%). Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) covers 27,500 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons