Skip to main content
PensionRisk

San Francisco Employees Retirement System vs Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

San Francisco Employees Retirement System (A) and Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 87% and 90% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 84/100 (A) compared to San Francisco Employees Retirement System at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 2.2 percentage points (89.5% vs 87.3%). Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) covers 27,500 participants.

MetricSan Francisco Employees Retirement SystemLos Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)84/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
87.3%89.5%*
Total Assets$33.8B$31.2B
Total Liabilities$38.7B$34.9B*
Unfunded Liability$4.9B$3.7B*
Participants68,00027,500
1-Year Investment Return6.4%6.5%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorCity and County of San FranciscoCity of Los Angeles

Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 84/100 (A) compared to San Francisco Employees Retirement System at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 2.2 percentage points (89.5% vs 87.3%). Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) covers 27,500 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons