Skip to main content
PensionRisk

University of California Retirement Plan vs Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

University of California Retirement Plan (B) and Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 84% and 90% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 84/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.0 percentage points (89.5% vs 83.5%). Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) covers 27,500 participants.

MetricUniversity of California Retirement PlanLos Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
78/100 (B)84/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
83.5%89.5%*
Total Assets$82.0B$31.2B
Total Liabilities$98.2B$34.9B*
Unfunded Liability$16.2B$3.7B*
Participants305,00027,500
1-Year Investment Return7.2%*6.5%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorUniversity of CaliforniaCity of Los Angeles

Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 84/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.0 percentage points (89.5% vs 83.5%). Los Angeles Fire & Police Pensions (LAFPP) covers 27,500 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons