California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.3 percentage points (72.9% vs 74.2%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.
| Metric | California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 73/100 (B)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.9% | 74.2%* |
| Total Assets | $318.0B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $436.0B | $124.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $118.0B | $32.0B* |
| Participants | 985,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of California | New York City |
California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 1.3 percentage points (72.9% vs 74.2%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.