Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (A) and National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 19.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 74.3%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricCentral States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundNational Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*74.3%
Total Assets$55.6B$1.5B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$2.0B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$523.2M*
Participants634,86118,619
1-Year Investment Return4.5%5.2%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorTeamsters Central StatesIBEW & NECA

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 19.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 74.3%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons