Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 32.3 percentage points (97.1% vs 64.8%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.
| Metric | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 61/100 (C) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 64.8% | 97.1%* |
| Total Assets | $58.0B | $131.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $89.5B* | $134.9B |
| Unfunded Liability | $31.5B | $3.9B* |
| Participants | 625,000 | 433,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | low |
| Sponsor | State of Colorado | State of New York |
New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 32.3 percentage points (97.1% vs 64.8%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.