Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (76.8% vs 64.8%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.
| Metric | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) | NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 61/100 (C) | 71/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 64.8% | 76.8%* |
| Total Assets | $58.0B | $77.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $89.5B* | $100.5B |
| Unfunded Liability | $31.5B | $23.3B* |
| Participants | 625,000 | 370,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.5% | 5.6%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Colorado | New York City |
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 12.0 percentage points (76.8% vs 64.8%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.