Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) grades C while Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) grades A. Funding ratios: 65% vs 88%.

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.8%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.

MetricColorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
61/100 (C)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.8%87.8%*
Total Assets$58.0B$36.8B
Total Liabilities$89.5B$41.9B*
Unfunded Liability$31.5B$5.1B*
Participants625,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%6.3%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of ColoradoTexas Cities

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (87.8% vs 64.8%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.

Explore More