Skip to main content
PensionRisk

ExxonMobil Pension Plan vs Houston Municipal Employees Pension System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

ExxonMobil Pension Plan and Houston Municipal Employees Pension System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: ExxonMobil Pension Plan grades A while Houston Municipal Employees Pension System grades C. Funding ratios: 114% vs 58%.

ExxonMobil Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Houston Municipal Employees Pension System at 55/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 55.6 percentage points (113.8% vs 58.2%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

MetricExxonMobil Pension PlanHouston Municipal Employees Pension System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*55/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
113.8%*58.2%
Total Assets$11.4B$4.5B
Total Liabilities$10.0B$7.7B*
Unfunded Liability$0*$3.2B
Participants61,47528,000
1-Year Investment Return7.4%*5.1%
Plan Typecorporatepublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorExxonMobilCity of Houston

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Houston Municipal Employees Pension System at 55/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 55.6 percentage points (113.8% vs 58.2%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons