Skip to main content
PensionRisk

General Electric Pension Plan vs Deere & Company Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

General Electric Pension Plan (A) and Deere & Company Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 91% and 124% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 33.1 percentage points (124.0% vs 91.0%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

MetricGeneral Electric Pension PlanDeere & Company Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
95/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
91.0%124.0%*
Total Assets$20.2B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$22.2B$17.0B*
Unfunded Liability$2.0B$0*
Participants121,73083,076
1-Year Investment Return6.8%7.4%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorGE Aerospace (formerly General Electric)John Deere

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Electric Pension Plan at 95/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 33.1 percentage points (124.0% vs 91.0%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons