Skip to main content
PensionRisk

General Electric Pension Plan vs Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

General Electric Pension Plan and Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: General Electric Pension Plan grades A while Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan grades B. Funding ratios: 91% vs 79%.

General Electric Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

General Electric Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.2 percentage points (91.0% vs 78.8%). General Electric Pension Plan covers 121,730 participants.

MetricGeneral Electric Pension PlanLockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
95/100 (A)*70/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
91.0%*78.8%
Total Assets$20.2B$17.4B
Total Liabilities$22.2B$22.1B*
Unfunded Liability$2.0B*$4.7B
Participants121,73084,564
1-Year Investment Return6.8%7.1%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorGE Aerospace (formerly General Electric)Lockheed Martin

General Electric Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 12.2 percentage points (91.0% vs 78.8%). General Electric Pension Plan covers 121,730 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons