Skip to main content
PensionRisk

IBM Personal Pension Plan vs New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

IBM Personal Pension Plan and New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: IBM Personal Pension Plan grades A while New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund grades C. Funding ratios: 131% vs 50%.

IBM Personal Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 80.7 percentage points (131.0% vs 50.3%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 140,566 participants.

MetricIBM Personal Pension PlanNew York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*61/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
131.0%*50.3%
Total Assets$24.4B$1.8B
Total Liabilities$18.7B$3.7B*
Unfunded Liability$0*$1.8B
Participants140,56633,330
1-Year Investment Return7.6%*4.3%
Plan Typecorporatemultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorIBM CorporationNY Teamsters Conference

IBM Personal Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 80.7 percentage points (131.0% vs 50.3%). IBM Personal Pension Plan covers 140,566 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons