Skip to main content
PensionRisk

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) and New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 74% and 50% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.9 percentage points (74.2% vs 50.3%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.

MetricNYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
68/100 (B)*61/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
74.2%*50.3%
Total Assets$92.0B$1.8B
Total Liabilities$124.0B$3.7B*
Unfunded Liability$32.0B$1.8B*
Participants225,00033,330
1-Year Investment Return5.4%*4.3%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatehigh
SponsorNew York CityNY Teamsters Conference

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 23.9 percentage points (74.2% vs 50.3%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons