Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 27.6 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.7%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 44/100 (D) | 68/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 44.7% | 72.3%* |
| Total Assets | $62.8B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $140.5B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $77.7B | $9.5B* |
| Participants | 424,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 5.9%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | State of Kansas |
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 27.6 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.7%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.