Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) vs Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 12.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 60.1%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.
| Metric | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) | Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.3%* | 60.1% |
| Total Assets | $24.8B | $29.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $34.3B* | $48.3B |
| Unfunded Liability | $9.5B* | $19.3B |
| Participants | 328,000 | 322,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.9%* | 5.3% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | State of Kansas | State of Mississippi |
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 12.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 60.1%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.