Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund vs International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund (C) and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 50% and 71% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 21.2 percentage points (71.4% vs 50.3%). International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust covers 729 participants.

MetricNew York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundInternational Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
61/100 (C)79/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
50.3%71.4%*
Total Assets$1.8B$139.8M
Total Liabilities$3.7B$195.7M*
Unfunded Liability$1.8B$55.9M*
Participants33,330729
1-Year Investment Return4.3%5.5%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorNY Teamsters ConferenceBoilermakers Union

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 21.2 percentage points (71.4% vs 50.3%). International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust covers 729 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons