Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund vs National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund (C) and National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 50% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 24.0 percentage points (74.3% vs 50.3%). National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) covers 18,619 participants.

MetricNew York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundNational Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
61/100 (C)80/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
50.3%74.3%*
Total Assets$1.8B$1.5B
Total Liabilities$3.7B$2.0B*
Unfunded Liability$1.8B$523.2M*
Participants33,33018,619
1-Year Investment Return4.3%5.2%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorNY Teamsters ConferenceIBEW & NECA

National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 24.0 percentage points (74.3% vs 50.3%). National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) covers 18,619 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons