North Carolina Retirement Systems vs Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
North Carolina Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.2 percentage points (87.1% vs 81.9%). North Carolina Retirement Systems covers 960,000 participants.
| Metric | North Carolina Retirement Systems | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 79/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.1%* | 81.9% |
| Total Assets | $112.0B | $46.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $128.6B | $56.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $16.6B | $10.2B* |
| Participants | 960,000 | 590,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.6%* | 6.2% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of North Carolina | Teamsters Western Conference |
North Carolina Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.2 percentage points (87.1% vs 81.9%). North Carolina Retirement Systems covers 960,000 participants.