North Carolina Retirement Systems vs Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
North Carolina Retirement Systems (A) and Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 87% and 94% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to North Carolina Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 87.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | North Carolina Retirement Systems | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A) | 97/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.1% | 94.1%* |
| Total Assets | $112.0B | $55.6B |
| Total Liabilities | $128.6B | $59.1B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $16.6B | $3.5B* |
| Participants | 960,000 | 634,861 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.6%* | 6.2% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of North Carolina | Teamsters Western Conference |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to North Carolina Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 7.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 87.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.