NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 30.1 percentage points (74.2% vs 44.1%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.
| Metric | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B)* | 42/100 (D) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 74.2%* | 44.1% |
| Total Assets | $92.0B | $22.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $51.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $32.0B | $28.5B* |
| Participants | 225,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.4%* | 5.1% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | critical |
| Sponsor | New York City | State of Illinois |
NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 30.1 percentage points (74.2% vs 44.1%). NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 225,000 participants.