Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.0 percentage points (77.3% vs 72.3%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 72/100 (B)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.3%* | 72.3% |
| Total Assets | $84.0B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $108.7B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $24.7B | $9.5B* |
| Participants | 375,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.7% | 5.9%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Oregon | State of Kansas |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 5.0 percentage points (77.3% vs 72.3%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.