Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs University of California Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) and University of California Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) grades C while University of California Retirement Plan grades B. Funding ratios: 58% vs 84%.

University of California Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 25.7 percentage points (83.5% vs 57.8%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.

MetricPennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS)University of California Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
54/100 (C)78/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
57.8%83.5%*
Total Assets$72.0B$82.0B
Total Liabilities$124.6B$98.2B*
Unfunded Liability$52.6B$16.2B*
Participants518,000305,000
1-Year Investment Return5.1%7.2%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of PennsylvaniaUniversity of California

University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 25.7 percentage points (83.5% vs 57.8%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.

Explore More