Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) and Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 64% and 78% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 64.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundIndiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)70/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%78.2%*
Total Assets$21.0B$37.0B
Total Liabilities$32.8B*$47.3B
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$10.3B*
Participants430,000425,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%6.1%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorUnited Association (UA)State of Indiana

Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.1 percentage points (78.2% vs 64.1%). Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) covers 425,000 participants.

Explore More