Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C while Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) grades A. Funding ratios: 64% vs 85%.

Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 20.7 percentage points (84.8% vs 64.1%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundIowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)80/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%84.8%*
Total Assets$21.0B$35.5B
Total Liabilities$32.8B*$41.9B
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$6.4B*
Participants430,000372,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%6.4%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorUnited Association (UA)State of Iowa

Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 20.7 percentage points (84.8% vs 64.1%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.

Explore More