Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C while Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 64% vs 83%.

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 91/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.5 percentage points (82.6% vs 64.1%). Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund covers 148,965 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundSheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)91/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%82.6%*
Total Assets$21.0B$7.5B
Total Liabilities$32.8B$9.1B*
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$1.6B*
Participants430,000148,965
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*5.3%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorUnited Association (UA)Sheet Metal Workers International Association

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 91/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.5 percentage points (82.6% vs 64.1%). Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund covers 148,965 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons