Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) and State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) (D) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 64% and 44% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 20.0 percentage points (64.1% vs 44.1%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundState Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)*42/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%*44.1%
Total Assets$21.0B$22.5B
Total Liabilities$32.8B*$51.0B
Unfunded Liability$11.8B*$28.5B
Participants430,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*5.1%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighcritical
SponsorUnited Association (UA)State of Illinois

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 56/100 (C) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 20.0 percentage points (64.1% vs 44.1%). Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund covers 430,000 participants.

Explore More