South Carolina Retirement System vs Maryland State Retirement & Pension System
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.0 percentage points (72.1% vs 55.1%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.
| Metric | South Carolina Retirement System | Maryland State Retirement & Pension System |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 52/100 (C) | 67/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 55.1% | 72.1%* |
| Total Assets | $35.5B | $61.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $64.4B* | $84.6B |
| Unfunded Liability | $28.9B | $23.6B* |
| Participants | 575,000 | 398,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.2% | 5.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of South Carolina | State of Maryland |
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.0 percentage points (72.1% vs 55.1%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.