Skip to main content
PensionRisk

South Carolina Retirement System vs New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

South Carolina Retirement System and New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: South Carolina Retirement System grades C while New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) grades A. Funding ratios: 55% vs 97%.

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 42.0 percentage points (97.1% vs 55.1%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

MetricSouth Carolina Retirement SystemNew York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
52/100 (C)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
55.1%97.1%*
Total Assets$35.5B$131.0B
Total Liabilities$64.4B*$134.9B
Unfunded Liability$28.9B$3.9B*
Participants575,000433,000
1-Year Investment Return5.2%6.8%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of South CarolinaState of New York

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 42.0 percentage points (97.1% vs 55.1%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

Explore More