Skip to main content
PensionRisk

South Carolina Retirement System vs NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

South Carolina Retirement System (C) and NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) (B) are close on the PensionRisk rubric. Funding ratios sit at 55% and 77% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Reviewed by PensionRisk Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 21.7 percentage points (76.8% vs 55.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.

MetricSouth Carolina Retirement SystemNYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
52/100 (C)71/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
55.1%76.8%*
Total Assets$35.5B$77.2B
Total Liabilities$64.4B*$100.5B
Unfunded Liability$28.9B$23.3B*
Participants575,000370,000
1-Year Investment Return5.2%5.6%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorState of South CarolinaNew York City

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 21.7 percentage points (76.8% vs 55.1%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.

Explore More

South Carolina Retirement System full profile|NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) full profile

Related Comparisons