State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.0 percentage points (80.2% vs 74.2%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.
| Metric | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) | NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.2%* | 74.2% |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $92.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $112.2B* | $124.0B |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.2B* | $32.0B |
| Participants | 507,000 | 225,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | New York City |
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.0 percentage points (80.2% vs 74.2%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.