Skip to main content
PensionRisk

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs UPS Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) (A) and UPS Retirement Plan (A) are close on the PensionRisk rubric. Funding ratios sit at 80% and 91% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Reviewed by PensionRisk Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.5 percentage points (90.7% vs 80.2%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.

MetricState Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)UPS Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)95/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
80.2%90.7%*
Total Assets$90.0B$9.7B
Total Liabilities$112.2B$10.7B*
Unfunded Liability$22.2B$993.0M*
Participants507,000243,932
1-Year Investment Return6.0%6.7%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of OhioUnited Parcel Service

UPS Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 95/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.5 percentage points (90.7% vs 80.2%). UPS Retirement Plan covers 243,932 participants.

Explore More

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) full profile|UPS Retirement Plan full profile

Related Comparisons