Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) (B) and Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 78% and 64% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 64.1%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%*64.1%
Total Assets$193.0B$21.0B
Total Liabilities$247.0B$32.8B*
Unfunded Liability$54.0B$11.8B*
Participants1,730,000430,000
1-Year Investment Return6.1%*5.5%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatehigh
SponsorState of TexasUnited Association (UA)

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.0 percentage points (78.1% vs 64.1%). Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) covers 1,730,000 participants.

Explore More