Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) vs New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) and New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) grades A while New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) grades C. Funding ratios: 92% vs 48%.

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 44.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 48.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.

MetricTennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
83/100 (A)*51/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
92.1%*48.1%
Total Assets$57.0B$28.5B
Total Liabilities$61.9B$59.3B*
Unfunded Liability$4.9B*$30.8B
Participants378,000268,000
1-Year Investment Return6.8%*4.9%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorState of TennesseeState of New Jersey

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 44.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 48.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.

Explore More