Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) vs ExxonMobil Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) (A) and ExxonMobil Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 88% and 114% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 26.0 percentage points (113.8% vs 87.8%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

MetricTexas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)ExxonMobil Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
87.8%113.8%*
Total Assets$36.8B$11.4B
Total Liabilities$41.9B$10.0B*
Unfunded Liability$5.1B$0*
Participants218,00061,475
1-Year Investment Return6.3%7.4%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTexas CitiesExxonMobil

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 26.0 percentage points (113.8% vs 87.8%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

Explore More

Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) full profile|ExxonMobil Pension Plan full profile

Related Comparisons