Skip to main content
PensionRisk

United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan vs New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan (D) and New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 51% and 50% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 1.2 percentage points (50.3% vs 51.5%). New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund covers 33,330 participants.

MetricUnited Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension PlanNew York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
49/100 (D)61/100 (C)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
51.5%*50.3%
Total Assets$3.3B$1.8B
Total Liabilities$6.5B$3.7B*
Unfunded Liability$3.1B$1.8B*
Participants73,91333,330
1-Year Investment Return5.0%*4.3%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorUMWANY Teamsters Conference

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 61/100 (C) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 1.2 percentage points (50.3% vs 51.5%). New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund covers 33,330 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons