Virginia Retirement System (VRS) vs Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Virginia Retirement System (VRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (75.1% vs 64.8%). Virginia Retirement System (VRS) covers 740,000 participants.
| Metric | Virginia Retirement System (VRS) | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B)* | 61/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 75.1%* | 64.8% |
| Total Assets | $87.0B | $58.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $115.8B | $89.5B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $28.8B* | $31.5B |
| Participants | 740,000 | 625,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0%* | 5.5% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | State of Virginia | State of Colorado |
Virginia Retirement System (VRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (75.1% vs 64.8%). Virginia Retirement System (VRS) covers 740,000 participants.