Virginia Retirement System (VRS) vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Virginia Retirement System (VRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.8 percentage points (75.1% vs 72.3%). Virginia Retirement System (VRS) covers 740,000 participants.
| Metric | Virginia Retirement System (VRS) | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 75.1%* | 72.3% |
| Total Assets | $87.0B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $115.8B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $28.8B | $9.5B* |
| Participants | 740,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0%* | 5.9% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Virginia | State of Kansas |
Virginia Retirement System (VRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.8 percentage points (75.1% vs 72.3%). Virginia Retirement System (VRS) covers 740,000 participants.