Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 17.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 70.1%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.
| Metric | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems | Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 66/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.8%* | 70.1% |
| Total Assets | $108.0B | $31.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $123.0B | $44.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $15.0B | $13.4B* |
| Participants | 528,000 | 327,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.7%* | 5.5% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Washington | State of Texas |
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 17.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 70.1%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.