Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 6.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 81.2%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.
| Metric | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 80/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.8%* | 81.2% |
| Total Assets | $108.0B | $51.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $123.0B | $63.1B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $15.0B | $11.9B* |
| Participants | 528,000 | 438,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.7%* | 5.8% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Washington | State of Illinois |
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 6.6 percentage points (87.8% vs 81.2%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.