Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems and Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Washington State Department of Retirement Systems grades A while Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) grades D. Funding ratios: 88% vs 45%.

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 43.1 percentage points (87.8% vs 44.7%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

MetricWashington State Department of Retirement SystemsIllinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)*44/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
87.8%*44.7%
Total Assets$108.0B$62.8B
Total Liabilities$123.0B*$140.5B
Unfunded Liability$15.0B*$77.7B
Participants528,000424,000
1-Year Investment Return6.7%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorState of WashingtonState of Illinois

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 43.1 percentage points (87.8% vs 44.7%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

Explore More