Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems (A) and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 88% and 92% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Washington State Department of Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.3 percentage points (92.1% vs 87.8%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.8% | 92.1%* |
| Total Assets | $108.0B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $123.0B | $61.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $15.0B | $4.9B* |
| Participants | 528,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.7% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Washington | State of Tennessee |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Washington State Department of Retirement Systems at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.3 percentage points (92.1% vs 87.8%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.