Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 94% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 93.7%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust | AT&T Pension Benefit Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A) | 97/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 93.7% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $30.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B | $32.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B | $2.0B* |
| Participants | 634,861 | 286,355 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 6.9%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Western Conference | AT&T Inc. |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 0.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 93.7%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.