Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) and Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 99% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.5 percentage points (98.6% vs 94.1%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustLaborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)99/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%98.6%*
Total Assets$55.6B$4.9B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$5.0B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$71.8M*
Participants634,86144,923
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.3%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceLIUNA

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 4.5 percentage points (98.6% vs 94.1%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons