Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.8 percentage points (81.9% vs 63.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.
| Metric | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust | Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B)* | 57/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.9%* | 63.1% |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $36.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $56.2B* | $57.4B |
| Unfunded Liability | $10.2B* | $21.2B |
| Participants | 590,000 | 245,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 5.4% |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Western Conference | State of Pennsylvania |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 18.8 percentage points (81.9% vs 63.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.