Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs South Carolina Retirement System
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and South Carolina Retirement System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust grades A while South Carolina Retirement System grades C. Funding ratios: 94% vs 55%.
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 39.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 55.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust | South Carolina Retirement System |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 52/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 55.1% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $35.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B* | $64.4B |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $28.9B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 575,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 5.2% |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Western Conference | State of South Carolina |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 39.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 55.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.