Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 76.4 percentage points (98.4% vs 22.0%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 29/100 (F) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 22.0% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $9.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $43.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $33.7B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 380,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 4.5% |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | critical |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | Teamsters Central States |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 76.4 percentage points (98.4% vs 22.0%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.