Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 21.0 percentage points (98.4% vs 77.4%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 77.4% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $74.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $95.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $21.6B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 405,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 6.0% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | State of Georgia |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 21.0 percentage points (98.4% vs 77.4%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.