Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 21.6 percentage points (98.4% vs 76.8%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 71/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 76.8% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $77.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $100.5B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $23.3B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 370,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 5.6% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | New York City |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 21.6 percentage points (98.4% vs 76.8%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.