Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 6.3 percentage points (98.4% vs 92.1%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 83/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 92.1% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $61.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $4.9B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 6.8% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | State of Tennessee |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 6.3 percentage points (98.4% vs 92.1%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.