Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.6 percentage points (98.4% vs 87.8%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) | Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 86/100 (A)* | 82/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 98.4%* | 87.8% |
| Total Assets | $122.0B | $36.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.0B | $41.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $2.0B* | $5.1B |
| Participants | 665,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.2%* | 6.3% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Wisconsin | Texas Cities |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.6 percentage points (98.4% vs 87.8%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.